Unsurprisingly the story dominating today's news agenda is the revelation of Jihadi John's real identity. The security service and the police do not come out of it well. Our splash is "MI5 blunders that allowed Jihadi John to slip the net". Similarly, the Guardian has "Isis murderer is Londoner on MI5's radar since 2009" on its front page. The Times leads with "Isis butcher had been MI5 terror suspect for six years". The Daily Mirror focuses on the daughter of one of his victims, David Haines. "Please avenge my dad" is the headline. The Mail and the Sun both have a picture of a young Jihadi John on their front pages. "Jihadi Junior" is the Sun's take, while "Angelic schoolboy who turned into a reviled executioner" is the Mail's lead. It all raises serious questions for the security services. Both MI5 and the police came into contact with Jihadi John at least a dozen of times. A botched attempt was made to "turn" Mohammed Emwazi after he was first intercepted six years ago, when they feared he was trying to join a Somali terrorist group. Despite this, he was able to slip out of the country and join Isis in Syria. It is likely that MI5 will face an Intelligence and Security Committee inquiry into its dealings with Emwazi and whether more should have been done. Presumably someone other than Sir Malcolm Rifkind will chair it. Politically, we may well see yet anohter revival of the debate about security laws. Did weakened control orders help Emwazi leave the UK? Would the Snoopers' Charter (or something more far-reaching) prevent a repeat of this sorry tale? Meanwhile, the campaign group Cage has tried to put the blame for Emwazi's radicalisation with MI5. Cage's warped logic is the British security service was trying to prevent Emwazi from becoming a fully-fledged jihadist. In frustration at his treatment, Emwazi became a jihadist fighter. Ergo, the security services are responsible for Jihadi John. The sheer chutzpah of this argument is bewildering. There is, however, an audience for this warped logic. It has long been a popular narrative in the West to blame Islamist terrorism on Western foreign policy. The logic is that if Blair and Bush hadn't invaded Iraq, then these nice boys from west London wouldn't be chopping-off heads now. It is intellectually lazy and dishonest. Bin Laden's al-Qaeda, for instance, emerged originally from reactionary wars in central and eastern Asia, such as the battle for a separate Muslim state in the Philippines, the fighting in Kashmir, as well as the Uighur territories in China, and Afghanistan. In Nigeria, moreover, al-Qaeda off-shoot Boko Haram is fomenting civil war without mentioning Blair and Bush as their guiding inspiration. In short, we mustn't humour the line of argument that the West is to blame for Emwazi. As our leader points out today, King's College London's International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation have stated: "Radicalisation… is not something driven by poverty or social deprivation. Ideology clearly plays a big role in motivating some men to participate in jihadist causes." The sooner we understand and appreciate the fact that many are simply attracted to jihadism because it gives them purpose, fulfilment and the promise of heavenly glory, the easier it will be to deal with the issue. |
IMMIGRATION PLEDGE IN SHREDS NAUGHTY GEORGE INTERGENERATIONAL ROBIN HOOD LABOUR-SNP DEAL? FARAGE 11-POINT POLL LEAD CAM'S MONEY-MAKING KIDS
|
POLL OF POLLS |
TOO MANY TWEETS… BEST COMMENT
From elsewhere
AGENDA TODAY IN PARLIAMENT HOUSE OF LORDS |
Saturday, 28 February 2015
Holes in the net..
Thursday, 26 February 2015
Coming and going..
Immigration is back on the agenda today. It is not great news for the Conservatives. |
HAGUE DEFENCE WARNING ED BALLS: SEX GOD SCRAP BBC LICENCE FEE NHS DEVOLUTION LABOUR CHAOS IN BRADFORD ASK ME ANYTHING. JUST NOT THAT. CALM DOWN, DEAR |
POLL OF POLLS |
TOO MANY TWEETS… From The Telegraph Tim Stanley - Publishing Mein Kampf is the best way to undermine Hitler's poison From elsewhere
0930 ONS to publish its second estimate of GDP growth in Q4 2014 TODAY IN PARLIAMENT HOUSE OF COMMONS HOUSE OF LORDS
|
Wednesday, 25 February 2015
Never had it so good..
It's the economy, stupid, and the latest economic news is a pre-election gift for the Tories. Shares are up, inflation is down and former critics are being nice about Coalition economic policy Our splash is "FTSE 100 hits an all-time high" while The Daily Express splashes with "Shares rocket to record high", and the Times says "FTSE soars to new high as recovery gathers pace" on page one, too. http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/business/economics/article4364716.ece The Financial Times has the story on page one, but warns about getting too optimistic: "Footsie record return to tech bubble highs – but keep the champagne on ice" is their headline. Angel Gurria, head of the OECD has described the Chancellor's policies as a "text book" example for other countries. He said Britain deserved a "pat on the back" and now needs to "finish the job". This is surely good news for the Tories. Pensioners are a key demographic. They save. They like rising shares and they dislike inflation. And they vote. Tories are hoping that good economic news could even lure some older voters back from Ukip. And the economy remains the best Tory weapon against Labour. Now, let's see if the economic good news can lift the Conservative poll number out of the 32 per cent quagmire where it's been stuck for quite some time. |
RIFKIND STEPS DOWN Sir Malcolm Rifkind ended his 40-year parliamentary career yesterday after he was cut-off by No.10 and disowned by fellow MPs. It was a pitiful end. While insisting he had done nothing wrong, he admitted he may have made "errors of judgement", adding "we are all human beings in that sense." The FT report that he may be in line for a peerage following his swift exit. One Tory minister told the paper: "If he is exonerated, of course a position in the House of Lords is on the cards." TV STARS IN LINE TO REPLACE RIFKIND? Local Conservative members in Kensington will be given three candidates to choose from by the Conservative Central Office. James Cracknell, the Olympic rowing gold medallist and Jeremy Paxman are just a few of the names being bandied about, reports Christopher Hope. While the Sun says TV historian Dan Snow is being "pushed" by Downing Street to stand. TV personality Kirstie Allsop ruled herself out despite Twitter speculation she would stand. The Deputy Mayor of London, Victoria Borwick, is also said to be in the frame. It would certainly be a boost for the party's image to back a woman in such a safe seat. CAM VS VLAD The Guardian splashes on "PM deploys troops to Ukraine" This story also makes our page one and the Times. David Cameron's decision to deploy British troops to Ukraine to support government-backed soldiers came as a surprise. He warned not standing up to Vladimir Putin would have "deeply damaging" consequences for Europe. It is very unlikely that this move will have a decisive impact on the conflict, but it is symbolic. The troubling question is what happens next if Putin escalates Russia's involvement to a Nato member on the Baltic? Does the rest of the alliance really have the willingness to invoke its Article Five promise of collective defence? BOJO TO THE RESCUE The Times splashes on "Tories call for Boris to rescue their campaign". It reports that some in the party are worried that they need a more positive message and senior Tories believe placing Boris Johnson centre-stage in the election campaign would help lift them out of that 32 per cent quagmire I mentioned. YouGov polling for the newspaper confirms Johnson's status as one of one of Britain's most popular politicians. ORGANIC BRAIN FADES The Guardian run Natalie Bennet's apology for her LBC car crash interview on page one. The interview - which was timed to coincide with the Green's 2015 campaign launch - makes for painful listening. She attributed her excruciating performance to a "mental brain fade". Arguably it is a delight for Labour. Stephen Bush, formerly of this parish, writes in the New Statesman that Labour strategists see the Green leader as their secret weapon. However, it remains to be seen how much harm it will do to the Greens come May. There may be some movement among voters alarmed at her grasp of policy. But for many Greens it may not be a problem. The interview demonstrated that their leader isn't a polished career politician, which isn't necessarily a bad thing in their eyes (and indeed the eyes of other voters). It is possible, therefore, that disillusioned Labour voters who were planning to vote Greens will not be that bothered by the interview. Whatever the case, Michael Deacon's sketch on Bennett and the Greens today is glorious. UKIP NOT FADE AWAY? It has been a bad week for UKIP. First, the airing of the BBC documentary Meet the Ukippers in which former councillor Rozanne Duncan said she had "a problem with people with negroid features." Now, according to an exclusive YouGov poll conducted for the Huffington Post, people think that the party is just a flash in the pan and won't be around in ten years. With polls suggesting Ukip support is dropping slowly, is the Farage bandwagon finally starting to slow?
|
POLL OF POLLS |
TOO MANY TWEETS… @KirstieMAllsopp: Oh bugger it, I might as well say it - Malcolm Rifkind is my local MP & I doubt very much they'll manage to replace him with someone better. COMMENT From The Telegraph Graeme Archer - Natalie Bennett car-crash LBC interview: She had it coming Toby Young - Douglas Carswell is on manoeuvres. But will his pro-immigration rhetoric sink Ukip? From elsewhere Daniel Finkelstein - 71 days to go and Ed has no campaign in sight Rafael Behr - British politics isn't so much rotten as past its use-by date AGENDA 0930 BIS committee hears from Vince Cable 1200 PMQs ahead of an opposition day debate on MPs holding second jobs 1415 HSBC chairman Douglas Flint and chief exec Stuart Gulliver are to give evidence to the Treasury Committee on alleged tax evasion at HSBC's Swiss Private Bank 1415 Public accounts committee hears from BBC director-general Lord Hall 1630 Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt is to appear before the Public Administration Committee. He will be questioned on NHS complaints and clinical failure 1800 Nicola Sturgeon to give a speech about the future of Scotland at the David Hume Institute in Edinburgh TODAY IN PARLIAMENT HOUSE OF COMMONS Main Chamber 1130 Oral Questions: Scotland 1200 Prime Minister's Question Time Ten Minute Rule Motion: Employment of People with Disabilities (Reporting) - Debbie Abrahams Debate: Opposition Day debate (18th allotted day) - Subject to be announced Adjournment: Care for childhood cancers - Nicola Blackwood Select Committee 0905 Science and Technology: Future of the Food and Environment Research Agency. Room 15, Palace of Westminster 0930 High Speed Rail (London-West Midlands) Bill: High Speed Rail (London-West Midlands) Bill. Room 5, Palace of Westminster 0930 Business, Innovation and Skills: Work of the Department. Room 8, Palace of Westminster 0930 Health: Impact of physical activity and diet on health. The Thatcher Room, Portcullis House 0945 Human Rights: The UK's compliance with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. 1400 High Speed Rail (London-West Midlands) Bill: High Speed Rail (London-West Midlands) Bill. Room 5, Palace of Westminster 1410 Environmental Audit: A 2010-15 progress report. Room 6, Palace of Westminster 1415 Public Accounts: BBC estate. Room 15, Palace of Westminster 1415 Treasury: HM Revenue and Customs and HSBC. Room 8, Palace of Westminster 1430 European Scrutiny: EU document scrutiny. Room 19, Palace of Westminster 1500 Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: Work of the Committee 2010-15. Room 16, Palace of Westminster 1630 Public Administration: NHS Complaints and Clinical Failure. The Boothroyd Room, Portcullis House HOUSE OF LORDS Main Chamber 1500 Oral Questions Access to finance for small businesses Assessment of broadband services in rural areas and city technology hubs in the UK Whether soils in England will sustain long-term food production Leisure industry support for turban-wearing members of the Sikh community Legislation: Modern Slavery Bill - Report stage (Day 2) - Lord Bates Short Debate: Mental health services Select Committee 1000 Extradition Law: Private meeting. Committee Room 4, Palace of Westminster 1030 Agriculture, Fisheries, Environment and Energy (EU Sub-Committee D): Private meeting. Committee Room 2, Palace of Westminster 1600 Justice, Institutions and Consumer Protection (EU Sub-Committee E): Private meeting. Committee Room 1, Palace of Westminster |
Tuesday, 24 February 2015
Sir Malcolm and Mr Straw..
Unsurprisingly Sir Malcolm Rifkind and Mr Straw continue to dominate the news agenda, following our scoop yesterday and the airing of Channel 4's undercover report last night. "Straw to take job with firm he lobbied for in Commons," is our splash . The Times lead with "Party grandees' careers in tatters over lobbying sting" while the Daily Mirror splashes with "Top Tory: I am entitled to more than £67k salary". The fallout from the two men discussing using their privileged positions as politicians to help out a fictitious Chinese company in return for money is likely to stay on the news agenda for a little while. The only time many of the public care about politics is when they feel aggrieved and hard-done-by. Negative politics has an audience. An Tory gent like Sir Malcolm stating "You'd be surprised how much free time I have" and describing himself as "self-employed" is likely to grind some gears for a while. In particular, his claim that he wanted "the standard of living that my professional background would normally entitle me to have" is not going down well with the public. If there is one thing the British like to be annoyed off about besides the lack of sunshine in this country, it is politicians who appear greedy and deny any wrong-doing. It sticks in people's throats. It smells bad. People might not necessarily be able to pinpoint exactly what grates about it. It just does. In a sharp column in today's Times, Rachel Sylvester quotes a Downing Street strategist who describes it as the 'smell test'. Sylvester writes: "Perception matters as well as reality in politics… they unfortunately look like grasping grandees willing to sell their contact books, if not their souls, for £5,000… the whole thing fails what one No 10 strategist calls the 'smell test'." Richard Littlejohn also echoes this his Mail column, writing: "It can't be right that any MP can double his money by acting as a glorified errand boy for a private company." So, besides the party suspensions and ongoing parliamentary investigation should anything be done to stop this happening again in the future? Or should we just accept that politicians having second jobs and outside interests is something that is part of our political landscape? Dan Hodges says the answer is to whack up MPs pay to £150,000. But is this too simplistic a notion? Would this stop potential MPs from entering parliament? And, if so, would this stop our political lives being as enriched? Philip Johnston says we need MPs with experience of real life. While The Sun's leader is slightly less generous with wages than Hodges but equally unequivocal about the negative impact of MPs having second jobs: "Ban MPs from any paid work beyond representing those who voted them in. Give them a generous, professional London wage…say £80,000. That ought to attract talent and reflect the responsibility and prestige of the job," the tabloid thunders. MPs pay is not an issue that is new, of course. It's been around for a while. Jim Pickard and Elizabeth Rigby write in the Financial Times that Britain's political leaders have been "agonising" about MPs pay for over a century since 1911 when David Lloyd George first introduced pay for members of parliament. The Liberal Prime Minister said at the time that the money was "not a remuneration, not a recompense, it is not even a salary." David Cameron echoed that sentiment yesterday, rejecting Labour's calls for new restrictions on second jobs in the wake of another undercover sting on MPs. Miliband wrote to him asking him "follow my lead" by banning MPs' paid directorships and consultancies. Mr Cameron said he opposed a complete ban on MPs' outside interests, saying that these often enriched the knowledge base of parliament. This was the only answer he could give. Backing Ed Miliband on this point would indubitably cause trouble in his party. Indeed, of the 180 MPs with second jobs that we revealed in The Daily Telegraph yesterday – 112 are Tories, whilst just 43 are Labour. And of the top ten highest earning MPs, six of these are Tories. MR STRAW AND THE REVOLVING DOOR Our front page story about Jack Straw taking up a job when he leaves parliament with a company that won a government contract worth £75 million after he lobbied a minister on its behalf will raise fresh questions about the so-called 'revolving door'. The former foreign secretary boasted to undercover reporters that he helped the furniture firm "get on the ladder" and secure government contracts. Mr Straw privately lobbied Francis Maude, the Cabinet Office minister on behalf of the company, Senator International and now he is set to join the firm's board once he leaves parliament in May. Again, this will stick in people's throats. SIR MALCOLM'S POSITION "UNTENABLE" Steven Swinford and Christopher Hope report that Rifkind's colleagues are to call for him to quit his role as the chairman of the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC). Last night on Newsnight, the former chair of the ISC, Kim Howells, said that he thought the position was a "full time job" and claimed he was "bewildered" by Sir Malcolm's comments. As he fights for his political career, Rifkind is to be told today by some colleagues at a committee meeting that his position as chair has become "untenable" and he should stand down. Francis Elliot and Sam Coates lead their Times coverage on Sir Malcolm being urged to stand down also as an MP, after Mr Cameron suspended him from the Conservative whip and ordered a disciplinary investigation. They report that, "one minister close to No 10 said: 'Malcolm should spare himself and the rest of us a lot of pain and just stand down now.' But Sir Malcolm is showingsigns he will nor go out without a fight. Pull up a chair and put your feet up, it should start to get even more interesting.
|
MIND THE AGE GAP The Financial Times splashes on "No country for young me – the UK's widening generation gap", which describes the "most dramatic generational change in decades" of young adults seeing their living standards slip whilst pensioners become increasingly better-off. The findings are based on official incomes data from more than £800,000 households stretching over 50 years. And in the Telegraph, Andrew Hood of the IFS explains how pensioners are now better off than the rest. The statistics come just as David Cameron intensified his appeal to older voters yesterday at a party event hosted by Saga, the service provider for the over 50s in Hastings. He pledged to protect pensioner benefits costing billions from any cuts if he wins in May. Our leader described it as "questionable economics". Unsurprisingly, The Daily Express gleefully reports that Cameron "rejected criticism that his plans to protect benefits worth more than £7.5billion a year would place an 'unfair' tax burden on young workers." In the Times, Lucy Fisher writes that Cameron insisted young voters support propping up benefits for the elderly, such as free bus passes and television licences. "Ask anyone," the PM said. "Do you want your parent or grandparent to be looked after as they grow old? They will say yes." The question is emotive, sure, but also very disingenuous. Wanting the elderly to be treated with dignity and respect in care homes is perhaps not the same as gifting well-off pensioners with free perks. But the old vote. The young don't. "You reap what you sow" is probably the political message here. TORY SURGE? CAN TAYLOR SWIFT SAVE ME? CAM DISTANCES HIMSELF FROM BACKBENCHER COMMENT |
POLL OF POLLS |
TOO MANY TWEETS… COMMENT AGENDA 1130: The OECD's Economic Survey of the UK is to be launched at a news conference by Chancellor George Osborne and OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría TODAY IN PARLIAMENT COMMONS Westminster Hall
Select Committee HOUSE OF LORDS Select Committees |
Monday, 23 February 2015
The next big scandal..
There's only one story in town today. The Telegraph, working with Channel Four, has revealed that Sir Malcolm Rifkind and Jack Straw discussed using their position as politicians on behalf of a (fictitious) Chinese company, in exchange for money. It is surprising that two elder statesman of British politics have behaved like this. They should know better, you'd think. Indeed, in 2010, commenting on the exposure of Labour colleagues for saying very similar things, Mr Straw commented: "There's anger… and incredulity about their stupidity…getting suckered by a sting like this." You said it, Jack. As chairman of parliament's Intelligence and Security committee, Sir Malcolm has access to some of Britain's sensitive secrets, so it's remarkable that he was so frank with what he believed was a Chinese company. How will this play with the public? "Just more snouts in the trough" will be the public's reaction. It doesn't look particularly good just before an election. The extent to which this will aid the anti-Westminster politics of the Greens and UKIP is unclear. But it certainly can't do such anti-establishment parties any harm. Straw is not standing for parliament again. His statement is that he offered his influence for cash after his time as an MP is up – so it remains to be seen whether he has broken parliamentary rules. He and Sir Malcolm Rifkind have both referred themselves to Parliament's commissioner for standards. A full investigation may take months. Speaking to the undercover reporter, Straw speculated that he may later be in the House of Lords. "The rules there are different," Straw said. "Plenty of people have commercial interests there… I'll be able to help you more." A new case for Lords reform? Or just for denying him the peerage he clearly expects? As for Sir Malcolm, he is standing again, but his redrawn seat is not as safe as it once was. And his interview on the Today Programme just now, in which he suggested we cannot expect MPs to "simply accept a salary of £60,000" may well return to haunt him wherever he ends up. Our leader today concludes the whole affair thus: "David Cameron once said that lobbying was the next great Westminster scandal waiting to happen. But it already has and nothing much has been done to arrest it. In truth, however, the much-touted remedy of a register of lobbyists would probably make little difference, not least when the approach is directly from an interested company rather than through an intermediary. "Surely what is far more important is for MPs to behave honourably and with total transparency so we can all judge the propriety of their actions for ourselves."
|
£1,600-AN-HOUR SECOND JOBSOur other big scoop today is that MPs have declared earnings of more than £7.4 million from outside work and second jobs in the past year, with some making more than £1,600 per hour. The most notable name in our investigation is former PM, Gordon Brown, who declared an additional income of close to £1million. He was followed by Geoffrey Cox, the Conservative MP, who declared earnings of £820,000 – 12 times the annual MP wage. BLUE-RINSE BRIGADEPensioners will keep their benefits of a free TV licence and winter fuel allowance so that they can have "dignity and security in retirement", David Cameron will pledge in the Tory manifesto. In the Times, Sam Coates and Laura Pitel write that Cameron's move is the latest attempt to halt UKIP and win over the age category with the highest turnout at elections. "This will mean greater cuts from the welfare budget, in a move likely to penalise the working-age poor further." While Macer Hall in the Daily Express write, "He [Cameron] will insist that universal benefits are a just reward to 'those who have worked hard, saved, paid their taxes and done the right thing'." |
POLL OF POLLS |
TOO MANY TWEETS…@PickardJE: Three certainties: Death, taxes, MPs caught in lobbying stings. COMMENTFrom the TelegraphThe Telegraph – MPs are still not being transparent on interests Dan Hodges - John Prescott: The bulldog who saved Labour From elsewhereMelanie Phillips - A feeble West emboldens the forces of chaos Anne McElvoy - The clash of two Eds raises the ghost of Labour past AGENDAMP's are returning to Westminster and assembly members are returning to Cardiff Bay after recess LONDON: The Home Secretary and Justice Secretary are to meet with the EU justice commissioner, Viera Jourova LONDON 1200: Mayoral question time TODAY IN PARLIAMENTCOMMONS: Main Chamber 1430Oral Questions on Defence David Cameron statement on European Council Serious Crime Bill [HL] - Report stage Serious Crime Bill [HL] - Third reading Oesophageal cancer - Mike Weatherley Westminster Hall1630 – 1930 Debate on an e-petition relating to ending non-stun slaughter to promote animal welfare - Mr Philip Hollobone General Committee 1630First Delegated Legislation Committee: Draft Civil Proceedings and Family Proceedings Fees (Amendment) Order 2015, Committee Room 9, Palace of Westminster Second Delegated Legislation Committee: Draft Companies Act 2006 (Amendment of Part 17) Regulations 2015 and the Draft Companies Act 2006 (Amendment of Part 18) Regulations 2015, Committee Room 11, Palace of Westminster Third Delegated Legislation Committee: Draft Anti-social Behaviour (Authorised Persons) Order 2015, Committee Room 12, Palace of Westminster Select Committee1400 High Speed Rail (London-West Midlands) Bill, Room 5, Palace of Westminster 1515 Public Accounts: Comparing inspectorates, Room 15, Palace of Westminster 1605 Transport: Smaller airports, Room 16, Palace of Westminster 1615 Communities and Local Government: Jay Report into Child Sexual Abuse in Rotherham, The Boothroyd Room, Portcullis House 1715 Political and Constitutional Reform: Government formation post-election, Room 8, Palace of Westminster 1900 High Speed Rail (London-West Midlands) Bill, Room 5, Palace of Westminster LORDS: 1430Oral Questions Business rates reform, steps taken to support UK high streets Effect of VAT on finances of sixth form colleges and non-maintained special schools Crown Prosecution Service performance following recent budget cuts Discussions with European Union member states regarding the handling of conflict in Ukraine Legislation Modern Slavery Bill - Report stage - Lord Bates Short Debate Hotels and facilities for disabled people |